<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>vividly nonsensical &#187; professional server</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/professional-server/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jirc.com</link>
	<description>it just makes nonsense</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 15:57:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Blackberry Professional Server &#8211; You&#8217;ll be missed!</title>
		<link>http://www.jirc.com/2009/02/27/blackberry-professional-server-youll-be-missed/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jirc.com/2009/02/27/blackberry-professional-server-youll-be-missed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 15:03:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mvarre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[blackberry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[professional server]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jirc.com/?p=243</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As reported on serveral sites such as BerryReview.com over the past few days RIM has announed they will be giving the axe to Blackberry Professional Software (BPS). For those of you not familiar with BPS, it began as &#8220;BES Express&#8221;, basically BES with a CAL limit of 15 users without the need to plop down $3k [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As reported on serveral sites such as <a href="http://www.berryreview.com/2009/02/26/rim-kills-projects-blackberry-unite-blackberry-professional-software-to-get-the-axe-soon/" target="_blank">BerryReview.com</a> over the past few days <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/rim/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with rim">RIM</a> has announed they will be giving the axe to <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/blackberry/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with blackberry">Blackberry</a> Professional Software (<a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/bps/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with bps">BPS</a>). For those of you not familiar with <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/bps/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with bps">BPS</a>, it began as &#8220;<a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/bes/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with bes">BES</a> Express&#8221;, basically <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/bes/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with bes">BES</a> with a CAL limit of 15 users without the need to plop down $3k to get started.  They then rebranded <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/bes/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with bes">BES</a> Express as <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/bps/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with bps">BPS</a> and upped the CAL limit to 30 and changed their development branch.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/bps/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with bps">BPS</a> users have been waiting for <a href="http://www.jirc.com/2008/11/04/blackberry-professional-server-still-without-html-support/" target="_blank">HTML support</a> for several months, all the while <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/rim/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with rim">RIM</a> has been telling us to be patient.  Well it looks like thats just a dream now.</p>
<p>This news might have horrible implications for companies like mine who thrive on the Microsoft Small Business Server installations for the 5-15 user offices.  One our biggest selling points is giving users the ability to be completed synced up wirelessly without having the spend the $3k like big guy&#8217;s do. That&#8217;s all gone now.</p>
<p>Anyone that has met me knows that I have a hard time functioning without my <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/blackberry/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with blackberry">Blackberry</a> in hand. I push this technology on customers, friends and barmates.  Once <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/bps/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with bps">BPS</a> is gone for good can I really continue to convert people <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/blackberry/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with blackberry">Blackberry</a>&#8217;s?</p>
<p>There is alot of speculation that <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/rim/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with rim">RIM</a> must be planning on replacing <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/bps/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with bps">BPS</a> with some other product, or at the very least a new pricing model for the full-fledged <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/bes/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with bes">BES</a>.  But alas this is still just speculation.  We can only hope they hear us loud and clear.  Make this right!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jirc.com/2009/02/27/blackberry-professional-server-youll-be-missed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blackberry Professional Server still without HTML support</title>
		<link>http://www.jirc.com/2008/11/04/blackberry-professional-server-still-without-html-support/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jirc.com/2008/11/04/blackberry-professional-server-still-without-html-support/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 19:25:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mvarre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[blackberry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firmware update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firmware upgrade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[professional server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rim]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jirc.com/?p=91</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anyone that knows me at all knows I&#8217;m a Crackberry Addict. I&#8217;ve been using a Blackberry for many years, I&#8217;ve converted many people to Blackberries, and I administer a big handful of Blackberry Servers.&#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; A while back RIM started giving away a version of BES (BES Express) that was the same as [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone that knows me at all knows I&#8217;m a <em>Crackberry Addict</em>. I&#8217;ve been using a <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/blackberry/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with blackberry">Blackberry</a> for many years, I&#8217;ve converted many people to Blackberries, and I administer a big handful of <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/blackberry/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with blackberry">Blackberry</a> Servers.&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>A while back <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/rim/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with rim">RIM</a> started giving away a version of <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/bes/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with bes">BES</a> (<a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/bes/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with bes">BES</a> Express) that was the same as the normal <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/bes/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with bes">BES</a> except for a 15 user maximum limit.&nbsp; User CALs for this version of the software still cost $100 each just like normal <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/bes/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with bes">BES</a> CALs, however you didn&#8217;t have to pay the ~$3000 for the full blown <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/bes/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with bes">BES</a>.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Well several months ago <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/rim/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with rim">RIM</a> stopped offering <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/bes/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with bes">BES</a> Express and changed it to <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/blackberry/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with blackberry">Blackberry</a> <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/professional-server/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with professional server">Professional Server</a> (<a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/bps/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with bps">BPS</a>).&nbsp; <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/bps/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with bps">BPS</a> now had a 30 user limit.&nbsp; Awesome! Mostly. <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/rim/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with rim">RIM</a> touted <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/bps/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with bps">BPS</a> as the new small business version of <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/bes/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with bes">BES</a>.&nbsp; All the same great features and benefits. However the major change in this is that it is technically a completely different product.&nbsp; Updates are released for <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/bes/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with bes">BES</a> separately from the updates for <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/bps/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with bps">BPS</a>.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Why does this matter you ask?&nbsp; HTML and attachment editing support of course! A few months ago <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/rim/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with rim">RIM</a> announced a <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/firmware-upgrade/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with firmware upgrade">firmware upgrade</a> for <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/blackberry/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with blackberry">Blackberry</a> devices that would support HTML and attachment editing.&nbsp; This <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/firmware-update/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with firmware update">firmware update</a> only does any good for you if the <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/bes/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with bes">BES</a> or BIS server you are using is also up to date with these new features.  To this date, the service packs that have this new functionality built into them are still not available for <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/bps/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with bps">BPS</a>. In my eyes this is a travesty. <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/rim/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with rim">RIM</a> allows you to purchase an &quot;Upgrade Key&quot; for <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/bps/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with bps">BPS</a> to <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/bes/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with bes">BES</a>, but this of course will cost you the full price of <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/bes/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with bes">BES</a> &#8211; $3000.&nbsp; This just isn&#8217;t possible for most companies running <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/bps/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with bps">BPS</a> &#8211; that&#8217;s why we&#8217;re running it in the first place of course!</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>I implore <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/rim/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with rim">RIM</a> to moving on this.&nbsp; Of all companies <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/rim/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with rim">RIM</a> should be well aware that as more time goes on there will become many more alternate solutions to the <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/blackberry/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with blackberry">Blackberry</a> platform. I don&#8217;t imagine it is a good idea to upset the small business market.&nbsp; One day we might not be a small business anymore and we might want to spend our $3000 on a different platform.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jirc.com/2008/11/04/blackberry-professional-server-still-without-html-support/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

