<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>vividly nonsensical &#187; VI</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/vi/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jirc.com</link>
	<description>it just makes nonsense</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 15:57:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>FAILED: A system error encountered during an operation</title>
		<link>http://www.jirc.com/2009/06/22/failed-a-system-error-encountered-during-an-operation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jirc.com/2009/06/22/failed-a-system-error-encountered-during-an-operation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 16:06:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mvarre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vmware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HOSTS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vCenter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VI]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jirc.com/?p=328</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anyone familiar with ESX will know how finicky it and vCenter can be about name resolution for all parties involved.  I typically make my VI and vCenter Server HOSTS file identical.  This usually solves all my HA problems and other weird issues that arise. Today I realized it&#8217;s also beneficial to duplicate the HOSTS file [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone familiar with <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/esx/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with ESX">ESX</a> will know how finicky it and <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/vcenter/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with vCenter">vCenter</a> can be about name resolution for all parties involved.  I typically make my <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/vi/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with VI">VI</a> and <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/vcenter/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with vCenter">vCenter</a> Server <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/hosts/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with HOSTS">HOSTS</a> file identical.  This usually solves all my HA problems and other weird issues that arise.</p>
<p>Today I realized it&#8217;s also beneficial to duplicate the <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/hosts/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with HOSTS">HOSTS</a> file on a machine that is being converted from physical to virtual using <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/vcenter/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with vCenter">vCenter</a> Converter (the machine I am converting). Before I appended those entries to the I was receiving &#8220;<span style="font-family: courier new,courier;"><em>FAILED: A system error encountered during an operation.</em></span>&#8221; each time I tried running the conversion.  The error cleared up right away.</p>
<p>I still don&#8217;t know why this continues to be an issue. The infrastructures are setup as vanilla and as &#8220;by the book&#8221; as possible.  DNS and WINS are always setup and working properly.  Short name and FQDN resolution always works from every host and client on the network.</p>
<p>I suppose it isn&#8217;t the end of the world. Seems like it should be an easy thing for <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/vmware/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with vmware">VMware</a> to &#8220;fix&#8221;&#8230;then again maybe they don&#8217;t consider it to be broken.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jirc.com/2009/06/22/failed-a-system-error-encountered-during-an-operation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cloning VM&#8217;s with multiple disks fail</title>
		<link>http://www.jirc.com/2009/02/26/cloning-vms-with-multiple-disks-fail/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jirc.com/2009/02/26/cloning-vms-with-multiple-disks-fail/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 19:36:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mvarre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vmware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[snapshot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virtual infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vmdk]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jirc.com/?p=230</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So I&#8217;ve had the problem in the past where I need to remove very old snapshots for ESX virtual machines and eventually after hours of merging it fails with no apparent reason.  Recently I was looking into how I could get aroudn this.  The idea I was testing was to use Converter Enterprise to esentially do [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I&#8217;ve had the problem in the past where I need to remove very old snapshots for <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/esx/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with ESX">ESX</a> virtual machines and eventually after hours of merging it fails with no apparent reason.  Recently I was looking into how I could get aroudn this.  The idea I was testing was to use Converter Enterprise to esentially do a V2V.  That way, if the conversion failed I will still have the original machine in its old working state.</p>
<p>After starting this process on a test VM, after 3 hours of converting it failed.  The logs gave me the following:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><code>UNKNOWN_METHOD_FAULT(vim.fault.NotAuthenticated)</code></p>
<p>I stumbled upon a post on the <a href="http://communities.vmware.com/thread/168468" target="_blank">vmware communities</a> that suggested I try the following</p>
<blockquote><p>When setting up the conversion, don&#8217;t use &#8220;convert all disks and leave current size&#8221;, use &#8220;select volumes&#8230;&#8221; and leave all volumes selected and the default options checked.</p></blockquote>
<p>I gave it another try and voila! Conversion worked without error.</p>
<p>I wonder if multiple disks has anything to do with the <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/snapshot/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with snapshot">snapshot</a> merging problems I&#8217;ve had so many times.  As I attempt to remember specifics of all past failed attempts, I believe they&#8217;ve all had multiple disks.  Maybe that was the problem all along?  As long as this Plan B works I&#8217;m happy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jirc.com/2009/02/26/cloning-vms-with-multiple-disks-fail/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Updating ESX 3.5</title>
		<link>http://www.jirc.com/2008/11/24/updating-esx-35/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jirc.com/2008/11/24/updating-esx-35/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 03:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mvarre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vmware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firewall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virtual infrastructure]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jirc.com/?p=163</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was doing some regular maintenance today in Virtual Center 2.5 today and realized Its been a couple months since I’ve installed any updates on my ESX 3.5 hosts.  I don’t think I’ve installed any updates since way back before August before the bugged Update 2 was release. Back then I had reinstalled VI 2.5 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was doing some regular maintenance today in Virtual Center 2.5 today and realized Its been a couple months since I’ve installed any updates on my <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/esx/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with ESX">ESX</a> 3.5 <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/hosts/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with HOSTS">hosts</a>.  I don’t think I’ve installed any updates since way back before August before the bugged Update 2 was release. Back then I had reinstalled <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/vi/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with VI">VI</a> 2.5 and forgot to reinstall Update Manager in <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/vi/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with VI">VI</a>.  Funny how you forget about things when they aren’t right in front of you.</p>
<p>When I first attempted to Scan for Updates I received the following error in <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/vi/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with VI">VI</a>:</p>
<p style="margin-left: 40px;"><code><tt>metadata for patch missing</tt></code></p>
<p>Searching through the forums suggested the <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/esx/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with ESX">ESX</a> host FW wasn’t properly listening for connections and suggested I run:</p>
<p style="margin-left: 40px;"><tt><code>esxcfg-<a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/firewall/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with firewall">firewall</a> --openport 80,tcp,out,dynamicupdates</code> </tt><br />
(port 80 was specific to my environment and may vary for your setup)</p>
<p>Once I did this the Scan for Updates ran just fine</p>
<p><span style="font-size: larger;"><strong>Onto the upgrade….</strong></span></p>
<p>Before the upgrade</p>
<p style="margin-left: 40px;"><code><tt>[root@<a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/esx/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with ESX">esx</a>-03 root]# vimsh -n -e 'hostsvc/hostsummary' | grep fullName </tt></code><br />
<code><tt>File not found. </tt></code><br />
<code><tt> fullName = "<a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/vmware/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with vmware">VMware</a> <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/esx/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with ESX">ESX</a> Server 3.5.0 build-<strong>82663</strong>", </tt></code></p>
<blockquote><p>1.Reinstalled Update Manager and attached the Critical and Non-critical Baselines to the <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/esx/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with ESX">ESX</a> <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/hosts/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with HOSTS">hosts</a></p>
<p>2.Put my first <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/esx/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with ESX">ESX</a> host into Maintenance Mode and agreed to all the informational messages that come with that</p>
<p>3.Selected all Guest VMs and migrated them to another <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/esx/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with ESX">ESX</a> host (I’m still not absolutely sure if entering Maintenance Mode actually evacuates all the running VMs.  I just migrate them manually because I can see it working)</p>
<p>4.Right clicked on the <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/esx/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with ESX">ESX</a> host and chose Remediate, chose both Baselines and Next’ed through the wizard.</p>
<p>5.30 minutes later the <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/esx/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with ESX">ESX</a> host was back up and running with the newest <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/patches/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with patches">patches</a> and updates. Repeat steps on all other <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/hosts/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with HOSTS">Hosts</a>.</p></blockquote>
<p>After the upgrade</p>
<p style="margin-left: 40px;"><code><tt>[root@<a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/esx/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with ESX">esx</a>-03 root]# vimsh -n -e 'hostsvc/hostsummary' | grep fullName </tt></code><br />
<code><tt>File not found. </tt></code><br />
<code><tt> fullName = "<a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/vmware/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with vmware">VMware</a> <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/esx/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with ESX">ESX</a> Server 3.5.0 build-<strong>123630</strong>", </tt></code></p>
<p>One thing I noticed after the upgrade was that the SSH server didn’t automatically start even though it was set to</p>
<p style="margin-left: 40px;"><a href="http://www.jirc.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/image.png"><img style="border: 0px none ; display: inline;" title="image" src="http://www.jirc.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/image-thumb.png" border="0" alt="image" width="317" height="210" /></a></p>
<p>I clicked START and all was well.  I will do more troubleshooting on this the next time I need to reboot the <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/hosts/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with HOSTS">Hosts</a>.  I’d rather not evacuate all my Guest VMs for this reason alone. For now I’m happy being up to date.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jirc.com/2008/11/24/updating-esx-35/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Backup ESX 3.5 with Asigra Televaulting</title>
		<link>http://www.jirc.com/2008/11/11/backup-esx-35-with-asigra-televaulting/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jirc.com/2008/11/11/backup-esx-35-with-asigra-televaulting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 15:31:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mvarre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vmware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[snapshot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vmdisk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vmdk]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jirc.com/?p=141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My approach to backing up guest VM&#8217;s from ESX3.5 is two-headed: Backup the data like you would a normal machine by attaching via SMB, NFS, SQL, etc.  Just get the data Backup the Guest VM via the ESX host (pull a bare metal snapshot of the entire system) Why backup everything twice you ask? Well [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h4>My approach to backing up guest VM&#8217;s from ESX3.5 is two-headed:</h4>
<ul>
<li>Backup the data like you would a normal machine by attaching via SMB, NFS, SQL, etc.  Just get the data</li>
<li>Backup the Guest VM via the <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/esx/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with ESX">ESX</a> host (pull a bare metal <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/snapshot/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with snapshot">snapshot</a> of the entire system)</li>
</ul>
<h4>Why backup everything twice you ask?</h4>
<p>Well fortunately for you and unfortunately for me I have a real world experience that will help answer this question. I had a vm guest failure and had to rebuilt a vm then restore data and settings.  Suffice to say this took forever. So here&#8217;s why you can do both&#8230;</p>
<ul>
<li>If data is deleted you have backup sets that have just pure data &#8211; files that are used by applications and users. If a single file gets deleted, corrupted, or anything else _bad_ the restore for this file(s) is quick and easy.  Restoration of this file(s) doesn&#8217;t need to affect every other user connected to the system in question.</li>
<li>If the OS becomes unusable, system files fail, <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/vmdk/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with vmdk">vmdk</a> (virtual disk) files on the host get corrupted then you now have the full machine backup to simply turn back on from date X/Y/Z. Asigra actually takes a native <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/esx/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with ESX">ESX</a> <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/snapshot/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with snapshot">snapshot</a> at the time of backup.</li>
</ul>
<p>Using Asigra Televaulting (or a small handful of other backup systems) allows us to perform backups that are compressed and bit level.  So, if I have a VM that has a 20GB <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/vmdk/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with vmdk">vmdk</a> disk, but really only has 8GB of data in the guest system, then the backups will actually be less than 8 because all that free space will be compressed down to nothing and then the 8GB of real data will further be compressed down.</p>
<p>My schedules are now setup to backup real data each night, but backup the OS (again using the native <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/esx/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with ESX">ESX</a> <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/snapshot/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with snapshot">snapshot</a>) once a week.  For the most part, system settings and configurations aren&#8217;t happening each day. So, if the guest VM dies, I can simply restore the VM to the last weekly backup (as of at the most 6 days) then restore the real data to to that machine (as of at the most the night before).</p>
<ul>
<li><em>A note for Asigra users &#8211; I&#8217;ve had a lot of problems backing up via <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/vi/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with VI">VI</a>.  So far attaching directly to the <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/esx/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with ESX">ESX</a> <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/hosts/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with HOSTS">hosts</a> seems to be working great.  The one fallback for this is you need to setup rules to ensure that VM&#8217;s stay on the same <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/esx/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with ESX">ESX</a> host.  Asigra only knows that a guest VM is on the host you originally configured it to be backed up from.</em></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jirc.com/2008/11/11/backup-esx-35-with-asigra-televaulting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>32 vmware snapshots debacle</title>
		<link>http://www.jirc.com/2008/11/03/32-vmware-snapshots-debacle/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jirc.com/2008/11/03/32-vmware-snapshots-debacle/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 15:13:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mvarre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vmware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[snapshot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vmdisk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vmdk]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jirc.com/?p=45</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So I was having some pretty significant performance problems with a vm running Windows Server 2003.  I thought it might be due to the fact that I had so many snapshots.  Fellow ESX admins over at the VMWare communities confirmed this to be the case. So my next step would be to combine all the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I was having some pretty significant performance problems with a vm running Windows Server 2003.  I thought it might be due to the fact that I had so many snapshots.  Fellow <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/esx/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with ESX">ESX</a> admins over at the <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/vmware/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with vmware">VMWare</a> communities confirmed this to be the case.</p>
<p>So my next step would be to combine all the snapshots and get rid of my delta&#8217;s by committing them all. I was going to run some guest updates first, so I again as always, made a <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/snapshot/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with snapshot">snapshot</a>. Something either guest or host related happened and the guest powered off.  When I went to turn it back on <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/vi/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with VI">VI</a> complained:</p>
<blockquote><p>too many levels of redo logs</p></blockquote>
<p>uh oh! the guest wouldn&#8217;t turn on!  it turns out that this <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/snapshot/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with snapshot">snapshot</a> was in fact the 35th <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/snapshot/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with snapshot">snapshot</a> taken for this machine. This 35th <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/snapshot/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with snapshot">snapshot</a> didnt complete correctly and was corrupted. it also turns out there is a 32 <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/snapshot/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with snapshot">snapshot</a> limit for VM guests.  Good to know <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/vi/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with VI">VI</a> tells you about this! &lt;sarcasm included&gt;</p>
<p>After frantically searching the web and forums for a solutions someone pointed me in the direction of a post here: <a href="http://zealkabi.blogspot.com/2008/10/virtualcenter-shows-no-snapshot-but-it.html" target="_blank">http://zealkabi.blogspot.com/2008/10/virtualcenter-shows-no-snapshot-but-it.html</a> which clearly shows the process i need to use to commit my snapshots, specifically Solution B:</p>
<blockquote><p>If solution A did not work then next step to follow is: use vmkfstools -i to consolidate snapshots.<br />
1. You can export the disk with vmkfstools to recreate the virtual machine:<br />
2. Execute the following command to create a directory for the new disk:\<br />
# mkdir /vmfs/volumes/UUID/new_RHEL5<br />
3. Execute the following command to point vmkfstools at the last <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/snapshot/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with snapshot">snapshot</a> file:<span style="font-size: 85%"><br />
<span style="font-style: italic"># vmkfstools -i RHEL5-000001.<a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/vmdk/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with vmdk">vmdk</a> /vmfs/volumes/UUID/new_RHEL5/new_RHEL5.<a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/vmdk/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with vmdk">vmdk</a></span></span></p></blockquote>
<p>Three hours later, snapshots 32 through 1 committed and a single <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/vmdk/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with vmdk">vmdk</a>.  While this commit process was running I realized i could have simply told <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/vi/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with VI">VI</a> to run vmdisk00032.<a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/vmdk/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with vmdk">vmdk</a> instead of the final (and corrupt) vmdisk00035.<a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/vmdk/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with vmdk">vmdk</a>.  this would have been the quick resolution to get me back up and running, and I could have don the <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/snapshot/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with snapshot">snapshot</a> committal at a better time.</p>
<p>Huge thanks to patrickds from the <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/vmware/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with vmware">VMWare</a> communities and SANJAT KABI (http://zealkabi.blogspot.com) for their knowledge!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jirc.com/2008/11/03/32-vmware-snapshots-debacle/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
