<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>vividly nonsensical &#187; vmdk</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/vmdk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jirc.com</link>
	<description>it just makes nonsense</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 15:57:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Cloning VM&#8217;s with multiple disks fail</title>
		<link>http://www.jirc.com/2009/02/26/cloning-vms-with-multiple-disks-fail/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jirc.com/2009/02/26/cloning-vms-with-multiple-disks-fail/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 19:36:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mvarre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vmware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[snapshot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virtual infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vmdk]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jirc.com/?p=230</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So I&#8217;ve had the problem in the past where I need to remove very old snapshots for ESX virtual machines and eventually after hours of merging it fails with no apparent reason.  Recently I was looking into how I could get aroudn this.  The idea I was testing was to use Converter Enterprise to esentially do [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I&#8217;ve had the problem in the past where I need to remove very old snapshots for <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/esx/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with ESX">ESX</a> virtual machines and eventually after hours of merging it fails with no apparent reason.  Recently I was looking into how I could get aroudn this.  The idea I was testing was to use Converter Enterprise to esentially do a V2V.  That way, if the conversion failed I will still have the original machine in its old working state.</p>
<p>After starting this process on a test VM, after 3 hours of converting it failed.  The logs gave me the following:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><code>UNKNOWN_METHOD_FAULT(vim.fault.NotAuthenticated)</code></p>
<p>I stumbled upon a post on the <a href="http://communities.vmware.com/thread/168468" target="_blank">vmware communities</a> that suggested I try the following</p>
<blockquote><p>When setting up the conversion, don&#8217;t use &#8220;convert all disks and leave current size&#8221;, use &#8220;select volumes&#8230;&#8221; and leave all volumes selected and the default options checked.</p></blockquote>
<p>I gave it another try and voila! Conversion worked without error.</p>
<p>I wonder if multiple disks has anything to do with the <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/snapshot/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with snapshot">snapshot</a> merging problems I&#8217;ve had so many times.  As I attempt to remember specifics of all past failed attempts, I believe they&#8217;ve all had multiple disks.  Maybe that was the problem all along?  As long as this Plan B works I&#8217;m happy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jirc.com/2009/02/26/cloning-vms-with-multiple-disks-fail/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Backup ESX 3.5 with Asigra Televaulting</title>
		<link>http://www.jirc.com/2008/11/11/backup-esx-35-with-asigra-televaulting/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jirc.com/2008/11/11/backup-esx-35-with-asigra-televaulting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 15:31:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mvarre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vmware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[snapshot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vmdisk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vmdk]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jirc.com/?p=141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My approach to backing up guest VM&#8217;s from ESX3.5 is two-headed: Backup the data like you would a normal machine by attaching via SMB, NFS, SQL, etc.  Just get the data Backup the Guest VM via the ESX host (pull a bare metal snapshot of the entire system) Why backup everything twice you ask? Well [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h4>My approach to backing up guest VM&#8217;s from ESX3.5 is two-headed:</h4>
<ul>
<li>Backup the data like you would a normal machine by attaching via SMB, NFS, SQL, etc.  Just get the data</li>
<li>Backup the Guest VM via the <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/esx/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with ESX">ESX</a> host (pull a bare metal <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/snapshot/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with snapshot">snapshot</a> of the entire system)</li>
</ul>
<h4>Why backup everything twice you ask?</h4>
<p>Well fortunately for you and unfortunately for me I have a real world experience that will help answer this question. I had a vm guest failure and had to rebuilt a vm then restore data and settings.  Suffice to say this took forever. So here&#8217;s why you can do both&#8230;</p>
<ul>
<li>If data is deleted you have backup sets that have just pure data &#8211; files that are used by applications and users. If a single file gets deleted, corrupted, or anything else _bad_ the restore for this file(s) is quick and easy.  Restoration of this file(s) doesn&#8217;t need to affect every other user connected to the system in question.</li>
<li>If the OS becomes unusable, system files fail, <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/vmdk/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with vmdk">vmdk</a> (virtual disk) files on the host get corrupted then you now have the full machine backup to simply turn back on from date X/Y/Z. Asigra actually takes a native <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/esx/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with ESX">ESX</a> <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/snapshot/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with snapshot">snapshot</a> at the time of backup.</li>
</ul>
<p>Using Asigra Televaulting (or a small handful of other backup systems) allows us to perform backups that are compressed and bit level.  So, if I have a VM that has a 20GB <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/vmdk/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with vmdk">vmdk</a> disk, but really only has 8GB of data in the guest system, then the backups will actually be less than 8 because all that free space will be compressed down to nothing and then the 8GB of real data will further be compressed down.</p>
<p>My schedules are now setup to backup real data each night, but backup the OS (again using the native <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/esx/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with ESX">ESX</a> <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/snapshot/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with snapshot">snapshot</a>) once a week.  For the most part, system settings and configurations aren&#8217;t happening each day. So, if the guest VM dies, I can simply restore the VM to the last weekly backup (as of at the most 6 days) then restore the real data to to that machine (as of at the most the night before).</p>
<ul>
<li><em>A note for Asigra users &#8211; I&#8217;ve had a lot of problems backing up via <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/vi/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with VI">VI</a>.  So far attaching directly to the <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/esx/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with ESX">ESX</a> hosts seems to be working great.  The one fallback for this is you need to setup rules to ensure that VM&#8217;s stay on the same <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/esx/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with ESX">ESX</a> host.  Asigra only knows that a guest VM is on the host you originally configured it to be backed up from.</em></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jirc.com/2008/11/11/backup-esx-35-with-asigra-televaulting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>32 vmware snapshots debacle</title>
		<link>http://www.jirc.com/2008/11/03/32-vmware-snapshots-debacle/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jirc.com/2008/11/03/32-vmware-snapshots-debacle/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 15:13:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mvarre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vmware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[snapshot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vmdisk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vmdk]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jirc.com/?p=45</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So I was having some pretty significant performance problems with a vm running Windows Server 2003.  I thought it might be due to the fact that I had so many snapshots.  Fellow ESX admins over at the VMWare communities confirmed this to be the case. So my next step would be to combine all the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I was having some pretty significant performance problems with a vm running Windows Server 2003.  I thought it might be due to the fact that I had so many snapshots.  Fellow <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/esx/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with ESX">ESX</a> admins over at the <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/vmware/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with vmware">VMWare</a> communities confirmed this to be the case.</p>
<p>So my next step would be to combine all the snapshots and get rid of my delta&#8217;s by committing them all. I was going to run some guest updates first, so I again as always, made a <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/snapshot/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with snapshot">snapshot</a>. Something either guest or host related happened and the guest powered off.  When I went to turn it back on <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/vi/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with VI">VI</a> complained:</p>
<blockquote><p>too many levels of redo logs</p></blockquote>
<p>uh oh! the guest wouldn&#8217;t turn on!  it turns out that this <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/snapshot/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with snapshot">snapshot</a> was in fact the 35th <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/snapshot/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with snapshot">snapshot</a> taken for this machine. This 35th <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/snapshot/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with snapshot">snapshot</a> didnt complete correctly and was corrupted. it also turns out there is a 32 <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/snapshot/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with snapshot">snapshot</a> limit for VM guests.  Good to know <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/vi/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with VI">VI</a> tells you about this! &lt;sarcasm included&gt;</p>
<p>After frantically searching the web and forums for a solutions someone pointed me in the direction of a post here: <a href="http://zealkabi.blogspot.com/2008/10/virtualcenter-shows-no-snapshot-but-it.html" target="_blank">http://zealkabi.blogspot.com/2008/10/virtualcenter-shows-no-snapshot-but-it.html</a> which clearly shows the process i need to use to commit my snapshots, specifically Solution B:</p>
<blockquote><p>If solution A did not work then next step to follow is: use vmkfstools -i to consolidate snapshots.<br />
1. You can export the disk with vmkfstools to recreate the virtual machine:<br />
2. Execute the following command to create a directory for the new disk:\<br />
# mkdir /vmfs/volumes/UUID/new_RHEL5<br />
3. Execute the following command to point vmkfstools at the last <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/snapshot/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with snapshot">snapshot</a> file:<span style="font-size: 85%"><br />
<span style="font-style: italic"># vmkfstools -i RHEL5-000001.<a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/vmdk/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with vmdk">vmdk</a> /vmfs/volumes/UUID/new_RHEL5/new_RHEL5.<a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/vmdk/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with vmdk">vmdk</a></span></span></p></blockquote>
<p>Three hours later, snapshots 32 through 1 committed and a single <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/vmdk/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with vmdk">vmdk</a>.  While this commit process was running I realized i could have simply told <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/vi/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with VI">VI</a> to run vmdisk00032.<a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/vmdk/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with vmdk">vmdk</a> instead of the final (and corrupt) vmdisk00035.<a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/vmdk/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with vmdk">vmdk</a>.  this would have been the quick resolution to get me back up and running, and I could have don the <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/snapshot/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with snapshot">snapshot</a> committal at a better time.</p>
<p>Huge thanks to patrickds from the <a href="http://www.jirc.com/tag/vmware/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with vmware">VMWare</a> communities and SANJAT KABI (http://zealkabi.blogspot.com) for their knowledge!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jirc.com/2008/11/03/32-vmware-snapshots-debacle/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

